Comments on: Do you think the bankruptcy court will follow the letter of the law in regards to Chrysler? http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240 Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:31:48 +0000 hourly 1 By: semper_paratus_1776 http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-400 semper_paratus_1776 Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:49:43 +0000 http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-400 Sure. Sure.

]]> By: William S http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-399 William S Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:22:25 +0000 http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-399 Over the weekend the White House used strong arm tactics to force secured credtors in the Chrysler bankruptcy to stand behind non secured lenders and this should be investigated to the fullest and should be brought to light...where the hell does Obama get off usurping the legal system when it comes to bankruptcy. Lets hope the legal system doesn't buckle to the demands of the Obama administration or this country will be no better than other countries that the government controls the courts. Over the weekend the White House used strong arm tactics to force secured credtors in the Chrysler bankruptcy to stand behind non secured lenders and this should be investigated to the fullest and should be brought to light…where the hell does Obama get off usurping the legal system when it comes to bankruptcy. Lets hope the legal system doesn't buckle to the demands of the Obama administration or this country will be no better than other countries that the government controls the courts.

]]> By: Call Me Bwana http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-398 Call Me Bwana Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:35:41 +0000 http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-398 It would be a grave and disturbing precedence if the US government tried to ******* the clear and established rules of bankruptcy law by giving the UAW primacy over the creditors of secured loans, based on political considerations. Obama has already shown a disturbing lack of support for the law by chastising the creditors of secured loans as somehow being evil or acting selfishly. Are we to be a nation of laws, or a lawless nation? It would be a grave and disturbing precedence if the US government tried to ******* the clear and established rules of bankruptcy law by giving the UAW primacy over the creditors of secured loans, based on political considerations.

Obama has already shown a disturbing lack of support for the law by chastising the creditors of secured loans as somehow being evil or acting selfishly.

Are we to be a nation of laws, or a lawless nation?

]]> By: American Splendor http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-397 American Splendor Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:38:04 +0000 http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-397 troll detected question disallowed reenter data troll detected
question disallowed
reenter data

]]> By: Craig C http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-396 Craig C Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:05:37 +0000 http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-396 No. Obama will have his greasy mitts all over these hearings manipulating the outcome to what he wants. No. Obama will have his greasy mitts all over these hearings manipulating the outcome to what he wants.

]]> By: Weasel McWeasel all that & chips http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-395 Weasel McWeasel all that & chips Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:56:44 +0000 http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-395 No . I think there's plenty of wiggle room in almost all laws........just depends how expensive your lawyers are. No . I think there's plenty of wiggle room in almost all laws……..just depends how expensive your lawyers are.

]]> By: ohmmm http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-394 ohmmm Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:20:47 +0000 http://smallbusinessbankruptcyinfo.com/240#comment-394 Obama does his fascist takeovers irregardless of the constitution. He is moving at breakneck speed to take over banks and major corporations and destroy American business and give away American sovereignty and dismantle our security. He forces banks, corporations, to take bailout money, then goes in and does a hostile takeover. What he's doing with GM is screwing over investors who lent money in good faith, who will now get pennies on the dollar and he will funnel that money to UAW thus securing for himself even MORE power as the fascist that he is. Obama does his fascist takeovers irregardless of the constitution. He is moving at breakneck speed to take over banks and major corporations and destroy American business and give away American sovereignty and dismantle our security.

He forces banks, corporations, to take bailout money, then goes in and does a hostile takeover.

What he's doing with GM is screwing over investors who lent money in good faith, who will now get pennies on the dollar and he will funnel that money to UAW thus securing for himself even MORE power as the fascist that he is.

]]>