Why hasn't the media talked about Obama's bill to give the UN.7% of our GNP and the right to disarm us?
This is just in from Sen. Coburn's office. Obama has authored a bill, and it is now in the Senate, to give the UN .7% of our GNP to be used to feed hungry 3rd worlders, AND to use UN force to disarm you and me and all gun owners. Why hasn’t the media brought this to the attention of the general sheeple out here.
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: Obama's bill S2433 passed the committee and going to the Senate
Senator Coburn is blocking this bill.
Patrick Guinn
Obama's bill S2433 would require the U.S. to initially direct .7 percent of our GNP into the United Nations coffers for distribution as they see fit, for "food" to third world nations. Under earlier agreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with the UN attempting to levy this on all first world nations.
The U.N. would have the power to increase this rate of taxation.
The U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty over foreign aid by putting it under UN control. The bill would force the U.S. to sign onto the U.N.'s Millennium Declaration, which would commit us not only to "banning small arms and light weapons" but also to adhere to the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Kyoto Protocol.
http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2433.html
Detailed Summary
Global Poverty Act of 2007 – Directs the President, through the Secretary of State, to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.
Requires the strategy to contain specific and measurable goals and to consist of specified components, including: (1) continued investment or involvement in existing U.S. initiatives related to international poverty reduction and trade preference programs for developing countries; (2) improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate; (3) enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate; (4) mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses and public-private partnerships; (5) coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other internationally recognized Millennium Development Goals; and (6) integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs.
Sets forth specified reporting requirements. Directs the Secretary of State to designate a coordinator who will have primary responsibility for overseeing and drafting the reports, as well as responsibility for helping to implement recommendations contained in the reports.
Defines specified terms.
Status of the Legislation
Latest Major Action: 4/24/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 718.
http://kilosparksitup.blogspot.com/2008/02/more-on-barack-obama-s2433-global.html
More on Barack Obama's S.2433 : Global Poverty Act
We know for a fact that this bill will cost America $845 billion above and beyond what America already spends on global aid in the next thirteen years. America will be locked in to giving .7 percent of the U.S. gross national product. That in itself is scary enough, but there is way more to Obama's bill. It also locks us into United Nations Millennium Summit. Cliff Kincaid from Accuracy in Media is all over this bill. He writes-(Underlined by me)
The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending.
"It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said.
Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable."
Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance."
"In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning 'small arms and light weapons' and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said.
Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims.
Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas.
And the only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," Kincaid writes.
On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed.(LINK)
This ladies and gentleman is the Barack Obama vision for America . WND called Obama's office and the others who support this bill….No comments.
http://kilosparksitup.blogspot.com/2008/02/stop-sen-obama-s2433-global-poverty-act.html
Filed under Blog by
Leave a Comment


Comments on Why hasn't the media talked about Obama's bill to give the UN.7% of our GNP and the right to disarm us?
Because everything you just said is a lie.
The bill you cons so rabidly quote about the UN in GDP is not what you say it is.
It is a bill asking the president to make a plan concerning global poverty in order to reduce terrorist threats to America in the future.
It is co-sponsored by Lugar, who is one of the most respected Republicans in the Senate (+3 other Republican Senators) and has the support of the Bush Administration.
Short answer , because it is a directive of the NWO..
He is in the CFR that states enough
Find the bill, then read it, then comment and take from it the parts that you don't like (if any)
Why do you trust these people that they are telling you the truth?
Please use your common sense. Do you really believe Obama would propose something like this on the eve of his nomination? If you sincerely believe that, then you have problems. If you have the ability to think for yourself, then you'll figure out in short order to stop listening to partisans. It will only fill up your mind with useless garbage that will make anyone with a smitten of intelligence and common sense make you look very very foolish.
===============
Life is so simple, but we insist on making it complicated
Confucius
551 – 479 BC
===============
Peace
Jim
.
Maybe because the potential for controversy?
Because there is nothing in the bill requiring that.
The UN has a big building planned for their selves and they need that money so they can have new comfortable offices to sit in.
That plan won't work as long as al qaeda is around.
In order to get any public outrage over this, you have to start attacking the public perception that the UN is still a force for GOOD in the world.
The UN is now CONTROLLED by the BAD guys.
The US and our allies in Asia and Europe are OUTVOTED in the Security Council and in the General Assembly by Russia and China and dozens of small countries which are massive abusers of human rights. Some of these nations are run by outright butchers and dictators.
They are even in control of the Human Rights Commission which kicked the US out and for a time was chaired by Libya and controlled by countries like Cuba, China and North Korea.
UN conferences propose rules that over-ride the US Constitution with sanctions against the US if we do things INSIDE our own country that pissant little dictators don't approve of.
If we are forced to give this money to the UN, the funds can be routed to the very countries that are on lists that the US State Department issues every year listing abusers in human trafficking, slave trading, human rights abuses, religious freedom, freedom of the press, women's rights, etc.
This bill is IDIOTIC. Obama is a FOOL for even proposing it.
Be AFRAID. Very, very afraid.
Do not listen to his pretty speeches. THIS is where his heart and mind are.
America is at risk from WITHIN.
I had a look at the link from War is Peace and I believe that the legislation could be read as authorizing the preparation of a plan to achieve ALL Millenium Development Goals, which would include the banning of small arms. If this is not desired then the language could be adjusted. Have a look at it below. Further, I do not think that anyone would have any standing to challenge the spending of money to do this, once this was passed.
I think that it is either sneaky or accidental and in view of the language, I think it is snealy.
I take the provision from the link provided by "War is Peace":-
(7) Coordinating the goal of poverty reduction [Struck out->]with other development goals, such as combating the spread of preventable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria, increasing access to potable water and basic sanitation, reducing hunger and malnutrition, and improving access to and quality of education at all levels regardless of gender.
←→
[